The underexamined role of money and how it undermines Nozick’s case for right libertarianism

In Anarchy, State and Utopia, Nozick presented his doctrine of right libertarianism, largely a contemporary restatement Locke’s moral imperative that an individual’s rights to life, liberty, property are absolute place limits on state action. Parallelly, espoused the free-market system as framework not only respects individual but ensures material benefits. While free market results in radical inequalities holdings widespread dispossession, treats process morally just any redistribution through taxation wrong. However, neither nor many critics fully considered role money capitalist markets, omission I begin address.
 
 asserts emerges pre-politically uncoerced actions individuals, it derives its value from commodity underpins it. This conception Nozick’s claims minimal can be is moral, efficient, neutral allocator resources. approach omits addressing how money’s general acceptability stability achieved. Answers found heterodox economic paradigms, which put at center creation, rendering (and state) incompatible with natural rights. Furthermore, by insisting nature, ignores seventeenth century revolution money, necessitated emergence capitalism inability underpin other words, credit should proper object analysis. go analyze what is, arose, why some form necessary context. Ultimately, argue compatible itself redistributive.
 Key words: distributive justice, Nozick, Locke, capitalism,